O'KEEFFE v. Snyder

Supreme Court of New Jersey · Decided 1980-07-17

Cited by 169 later decision(s) in our corpus · see the citation network in Lexace

Open in Lexace · Ask the AI about this case

From the opinion

SULLIVAN, J., dissenting. I do not see the need for a remand. We have plaintiff Georgia O’Keeffe’s affidavit and deposition concerning the paintings, defendant Barry Snyder’s affidavit as to the circumstances under which he acquired possession of them and the deposition *506 of third party defendant Ulrich A. Frank. Apparently, the parties felt that ther…

Read the full opinion (source) ↗


Lexace provides legal information, not legal advice, and no attorney–client relationship is created. Citation figures are counts of later citing opinions in our corpus and may be incomplete; always read and Shepardize the full opinion before relying on it.