Norton Ex Rel. Chiles v. Mathews

Supreme Court of the United States · Decided 1976-06-29

Cited by 304 later decision(s) in our corpus · see the citation network in Lexace

Open in Lexace · Ask the AI about this case

From the opinion

Mr. Justice Blackmun delivered the opinion of the Court. On the merits, this case raises the same question as to the constitutionality of §§ 202 (d)(3) and 216 (h)(3) (C)(ii) of the Social Security Act, 64 Stat. 484 , as amended, and 79 Stat. 410 , 42 U. S. C. §§ 402 (d) (3) and 416 (h) (3) (C) (ii…

Read the full opinion (source) ↗


Lexace provides legal information, not legal advice, and no attorney–client relationship is created. Citation figures are counts of later citing opinions in our corpus and may be incomplete; always read and Shepardize the full opinion before relying on it.