North American Vaccine, Inc. And National Research Council of Canada v. American Cyanamid Company and Praxis Biologics, Inc.

U.S. Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit · Decided 1993-12-08

Cited by 142 later decision(s) in our corpus · see the citation network in Lexace

Open in Lexace · Ask the AI about this case

From the opinion

RADER, Circuit Judge, dissenting. I agree with this panel that the district court erroneously concluded that claims 12 and 25 were invalid for indefiniteness. I also agree that the district court erred in relying on the inventors’ scientific articles to determine the scope of the claims. Unfortunately, I cannot support the rest of this court’s opinion. As the panel points out,…

Read the full opinion (source) ↗


Lexace provides legal information, not legal advice, and no attorney–client relationship is created. Citation figures are counts of later citing opinions in our corpus and may be incomplete; always read and Shepardize the full opinion before relying on it.