Noroski v. Fallet

Supreme Court of Ohio · Decided 1982-12-22

Cited by 170 later decision(s) in our corpus · see the citation network in Lexace

Open in Lexace · Ask the AI about this case

From the opinion

Per Curiam. The only evidence of the release at issue here is a tape recording of a telephone conversation between appellant and the adjuster for appellee’s insurer. That conversation appears in the record as two exhibits: the first an eight-page transcription regarding the facts surrounding the accident, and the second a one-page transcription, apparently from the same telephone conversation, which purports to be the…

Read the full opinion (source) ↗


Lexace provides legal information, not legal advice, and no attorney–client relationship is created. Citation figures are counts of later citing opinions in our corpus and may be incomplete; always read and Shepardize the full opinion before relying on it.