Nordstrom v. Nordstrom

Decided 1998-01-20

Cited by 232 later decision(s) in our corpus · see the citation network in Lexace

Open in Lexace · Ask the AI about this case

From the opinion

OPINION TAFT, Justice. Appellant, Cynthia F. Nordstrom (Cynthia), appeals from a child support modification order. Trial was to the court. We consider whether the trial court erred by (1) not requiring appellee, Peter J. Nordstrom (Peter), whose monthly net resources exceed $6,000, to pay additional child support above the statutory guidelines; (2) not o…

Read the full opinion (source) ↗


Lexace provides legal information, not legal advice, and no attorney–client relationship is created. Citation figures are counts of later citing opinions in our corpus and may be incomplete; always read and Shepardize the full opinion before relying on it.