Nickels v. State

Supreme Court of Florida · Decided 1925-12-01

Cited by 106 later decision(s) in our corpus · see the citation network in Lexace

Open in Lexace · Ask the AI about this case

From the opinion

I concur in the foregoing able opinion of Mr. Justice TERRELL, excepting only those portions holding that the confession was not voluntary, though I realize that the question is a very close one. And with reference to the lengthy statement admitted as a confession, I concur fully in the views of Mr. Justice TERRELL, that much of it was not a confession at all, but merely admissions against *Page 708 interest of various facts, some of them colorless, some…

Read the full opinion (source) ↗


Lexace provides legal information, not legal advice, and no attorney–client relationship is created. Citation figures are counts of later citing opinions in our corpus and may be incomplete; always read and Shepardize the full opinion before relying on it.