Neal v. Puckett

U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit · Decided 2002-03-15

Cited by 287 later decision(s) in our corpus · see the citation network in Lexace

Open in Lexace · Ask the AI about this case

From the opinion

E.GRADY JOLLY, Circuit Judge, with whom EDITH H. JONES, JERRY E. SMITH, RHESA HAWKINS BARKSDALE, DeMOSS and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges, join, Specially Concurring: I concur in the opinion of the court. We took this case en banc to decide whether “objectively unreasonable” required an expressly articulated definition. I agree that we need not attempt to articulate a precise definition of “objectively unreasona…

Read the full opinion (source) ↗


Lexace provides legal information, not legal advice, and no attorney–client relationship is created. Citation figures are counts of later citing opinions in our corpus and may be incomplete; always read and Shepardize the full opinion before relying on it.