Natta v. Hogan

U.S. Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit · Decided 1968-03-21

Cited by 126 later decision(s) in our corpus · see the citation network in Lexace

Open in Lexace · Ask the AI about this case

From the opinion

BREITENSTEIN, Circuit Judge. The issues here presented relate to discovery and production of documents under Rule 34, F.R.Civ.P., in connection with interference proceedings in the Patent Office. The district court granted limited discovery and the contesting groups have each appealed. On one side are Natta, Pino, and Mazzanti, and their assignee Montecatini. This group will be referred to as Montecatini.…

Read the full opinion (source) ↗


Lexace provides legal information, not legal advice, and no attorney–client relationship is created. Citation figures are counts of later citing opinions in our corpus and may be incomplete; always read and Shepardize the full opinion before relying on it.