Nardone v. United States

Supreme Court of the United States · Decided 1937-12-20

Cited by 389 later decision(s) in our corpus · see the citation network in Lexace

Open in Lexace · Ask the AI about this case

From the opinion

Mr. Justice Roberts delivered the opinion of the Court. The importance of the question involved, — whether, in view of the provisions of § 605 of the Communications Act of 1934, 1 evidence procured by a federal officer’s tapping telephone wires and intercepting messages is admissible in a criminal trial in a United States District Court, — moved us to grant the writ of certiorari.</p…

Read the full opinion (source) ↗


Lexace provides legal information, not legal advice, and no attorney–client relationship is created. Citation figures are counts of later citing opinions in our corpus and may be incomplete; always read and Shepardize the full opinion before relying on it.