OPINION OF THE COURT Chief Judge Lippman. This case arises from a determination of the Division of Housing and Community Renewal (DHCR) denying petitioner Paul *652 Murphy (Murphy) succession rights to a Mitchell-Lama apartment. Because the evidence of Murphy’s primary residency was overwhelming, and because there was no relationship between the tenant…
Read the full opinion (source) ↗
Lexace provides legal information, not legal advice, and no attorney–client relationship is created. Citation figures are counts of later citing opinions in our corpus and may be incomplete; always read and Shepardize the full opinion before relying on it.