Murphy Ex Rel. Murphy v. Astrue

U.S. Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit · Decided 2007-07-13

Cited by 397 later decision(s) in our corpus · see the citation network in Lexace

Open in Lexace · Ask the AI about this case

From the opinion

WILLIAMS, Circuit Judge. Nathan Murphy, a minor, applied for Supplemental Security Income after being diagnosed with Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD). Although the Administrative Law Judge (ALJ) found that Nathan exhibited marked difficulty in one domain of functioning, the ALJ denied benefits because impairment in two domains is required to qualify for coverage. In…

Read the full opinion (source) ↗


Lexace provides legal information, not legal advice, and no attorney–client relationship is created. Citation figures are counts of later citing opinions in our corpus and may be incomplete; always read and Shepardize the full opinion before relying on it.