Muhammad v. County Bank of Rehoboth Beach, Delaware

Supreme Court of New Jersey · Decided 2006-08-09

Cited by 134 later decision(s) in our corpus · see the citation network in Lexace

Open in Lexace · Ask the AI about this case

From the opinion

Justice RIVERA-SOTO, concurring in part and dissenting in part. To the extent the majority holds that the arbitration agreements in this case are enforceable, ante, 189 N.J. at 26, 912 A.2d at 103 (2006), I concur. However, to the extent the majority holds that the class-arbitration waivers in plaintiffs arbitration agreements are unconscionable, ante, 18…

Read the full opinion (source) ↗


Lexace provides legal information, not legal advice, and no attorney–client relationship is created. Citation figures are counts of later citing opinions in our corpus and may be incomplete; always read and Shepardize the full opinion before relying on it.