Mudrich v. Standard Oil Co.

Supreme Court of Ohio · Decided 1950-02-15

Cited by 124 later decision(s) in our corpus · see the citation network in Lexace

Open in Lexace · Ask the AI about this case

From the opinion

Stewart, J. Defendant insists that it is entitled to a judgment in its favor for several reasons which can be encompassed by three propositions: 1. That it owed no duty to plaintiff. 2. That plaintiff assumed the risk of the injury he received when he jumped into the gasoline fire for the purpose of putting it out.…

Read the full opinion (source) ↗


Lexace provides legal information, not legal advice, and no attorney–client relationship is created. Citation figures are counts of later citing opinions in our corpus and may be incomplete; always read and Shepardize the full opinion before relying on it.