Moure v. Raeuchle

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Decided 1992-02-21

Cited by 226 later decision(s) in our corpus · see the citation network in Lexace

Open in Lexace · Ask the AI about this case

From the opinion

PAPADAKOS, Justice, dissenting. I dissent. There is clear, unequivocal evidence in this record that Appellant, Dr. Raeuchle, was negligent when he “inadvertently” punctured an ovarian artery during the course of the instant operation. Subsequent unfortunate events all resulted from this act of negligence. It seems to me that the Superior Court was clearly right here to reverse a jury verdict for the doctor and t…

Read the full opinion (source) ↗


Lexace provides legal information, not legal advice, and no attorney–client relationship is created. Citation figures are counts of later citing opinions in our corpus and may be incomplete; always read and Shepardize the full opinion before relying on it.