Moss v. Guttormson

Decided 1996-06-26

Cited by 133 later decision(s) in our corpus · see the citation network in Lexace

Open in Lexace · Ask the AI about this case

From the opinion

KONENKAMP, Justice. [¶ 1] The issue presented is whether a salesperson adversely affected by product mislabeling can assert claims against the employer-distributor for deceit and for violating South Dakota’s Deceptive Trade Practices and Consumer Protection law. We conclude the claims are sustainable under both theories. Facts [¶ 2]…

Read the full opinion (source) ↗


Lexace provides legal information, not legal advice, and no attorney–client relationship is created. Citation figures are counts of later citing opinions in our corpus and may be incomplete; always read and Shepardize the full opinion before relying on it.