ERWIN, Justice (concurring). While I concur with the opinion, I would extend the concept of strict liability to cover “economic loss” rather than use the warranty theory advanced by the majority. The history of products liability law does not justify a distinction between personal injury and property damage. The primary purpose of the strict liability rule is to insure that the costs of in…
Read the full opinion (source) ↗
Lexace provides legal information, not legal advice, and no attorney–client relationship is created. Citation figures are counts of later citing opinions in our corpus and may be incomplete; always read and Shepardize the full opinion before relying on it.