Morrison v. Com., Dept. of Pub. Welfare

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Decided 1994-08-25

Cited by 128 later decision(s) in our corpus · see the citation network in Lexace

Open in Lexace · Ask the AI about this case

From the opinion

PAPADAKOS, Justice, dissenting. Although I commend my colleague who has done a superb job in describing the differences between scope of review and standard of review and alerting the bench and bar not to interchange their use as though they are synonymous, I cannot join in the conclusion that the trial judge did not abuse his discretion in ordering a new trial. I must therefore dissent. <p "b303…

Read the full opinion (source) ↗


Lexace provides legal information, not legal advice, and no attorney–client relationship is created. Citation figures are counts of later citing opinions in our corpus and may be incomplete; always read and Shepardize the full opinion before relying on it.