Morris v. Ohio Casualty Insurance

Supreme Court of Ohio · Decided 1988-01-13

Cited by 186 later decision(s) in our corpus · see the citation network in Lexace

Open in Lexace · Ask the AI about this case

From the opinion

Douglas, J. The sole question posed for our consideration is whether an insurance carrier may be liable for conversion when the carrier authorizes its bank to pay a draft over a forged endorsement. For the reasons expressed infra, we answer the question in the affirmative and, accordingly, uphold the decision of the court of appeals. It is axiomatic that a motion for < ="1" lab…

Read the full opinion (source) ↗


Lexace provides legal information, not legal advice, and no attorney–client relationship is created. Citation figures are counts of later citing opinions in our corpus and may be incomplete; always read and Shepardize the full opinion before relying on it.