Morgan Stanley Capital Group Inc. v. Public Util. Dist. No. 1 of Snohomish Cty.

Supreme Court of the United States · Decided 2008-06-26

Cited by 171 later decision(s) in our corpus · see the citation network in Lexace

Open in Lexace · Ask the AI about this case

From the opinion

Justice Stevens, with whom Justice Souter joins, dissenting. The basic question presented by these complicated cases is whether “the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission *556 (FERC or Commission) must presume that the rate set out in a freely negotiated wholesale-energy contract meets the 'just and reasonab…

Read the full opinion (source) ↗


Lexace provides legal information, not legal advice, and no attorney–client relationship is created. Citation figures are counts of later citing opinions in our corpus and may be incomplete; always read and Shepardize the full opinion before relying on it.