[This opinion has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 76 Ohio St.3d 383.] MOOTISPAW, APPELLANT, v. ECKSTEIN, PROS. ATTY., APPELLEE. [Cite as Mootispaw v. Eckstein, 1996-Ohio-389.] Mandamus to compel prosecuting attorney to investigate alleged fraud and collusion between relator’s attorney and an assistant prosecuting attorney in relator’s criminal convictions—Writ denied, when. (No. 96-777—Submitted July 10, 1996—Decided August 21. 1996…
Read the full opinion (source) ↗
Lexace provides legal information, not legal advice, and no attorney–client relationship is created. Citation figures are counts of later citing opinions in our corpus and may be incomplete; always read and Shepardize the full opinion before relying on it.