Douglas, J. The central issue for our determination in this case is whether the insurance policy limitation enforced by the courts below is valid under Ohio law. In order for a limitation on uninsured motorist coverage to be valid it must not be *29 contrary to the coverage mandated by R.C. 3937.18(A). Sexton v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. (1982), <span class="ci…
Read the full opinion (source) ↗
Lexace provides legal information, not legal advice, and no attorney–client relationship is created. Citation figures are counts of later citing opinions in our corpus and may be incomplete; always read and Shepardize the full opinion before relying on it.