MR. Justice Burton, with whom Mr. Justice Frankfurter, Mr. Justice Clark and Mr. Justice Harlan concur, dissenting. The Court’s decision rests upon its view that, despite the contrary conclusions of the Circuit and Supreme Courts of Michigan, petitioner has shown that he was in fact so alarmed that he was not able freely, intelligently and understanding^ to plead guilty and to waive h…
Read the full opinion (source) ↗
Lexace provides legal information, not legal advice, and no attorney–client relationship is created. Citation figures are counts of later citing opinions in our corpus and may be incomplete; always read and Shepardize the full opinion before relying on it.