Montrose Chemical Corp. v. Admiral Insurance

Supreme Court of California · Decided 1995-07-03

Cited by 321 later decision(s) in our corpus · see the citation network in Lexace

Open in Lexace · Ask the AI about this case

From the opinion

*695 BAXTER, J. I concur in the judgment, though not in everything the majority say. For example, I do not believe the policy language is as plain in plaintiff Montrose’s favor as the majority assert. Defendant Admiral’s comprehensive general liability (CGL) policies cover injury or damage “which occurs during the policy period” as the result of a defined “occurrence,” b…

Read the full opinion (source) ↗


Lexace provides legal information, not legal advice, and no attorney–client relationship is created. Citation figures are counts of later citing opinions in our corpus and may be incomplete; always read and Shepardize the full opinion before relying on it.