Moll v. Abbott Laboratories

Supreme Court of Michigan · Decided 1993-09-21

Cited by 161 later decision(s) in our corpus · see the citation network in Lexace

Open in Lexace · Ask the AI about this case

From the opinion

Mallett, J. (dissenting). Although I concur with the majority’s analysis, I dissent from the majority’s holding that Judith Harrington’s suit is barred by the statute of limitations. The majority holds that in a pharmaceutical products liability action, the statute of limitations commences when the plaintiff discovers or, through the exercise of reasonable diligence, should have disco…

Read the full opinion (source) ↗


Lexace provides legal information, not legal advice, and no attorney–client relationship is created. Citation figures are counts of later citing opinions in our corpus and may be incomplete; always read and Shepardize the full opinion before relying on it.