Mitchill v. Lath

New York Court of Appeals · Decided 1928-02-14

Cited by 135 later decision(s) in our corpus · see the citation network in Lexace

Open in Lexace · Ask the AI about this case

From the opinion

Lehman, J. (dissenting). I accept the general rule as formulated by Judge Andrews. I differ with him only as to its application to the facts shown in the record. The plaintiff contracted to pinchase land from the defendants for an agreed price. A formal written agreement was made between the sellers and the plaintiff’s husband. It is on i…

Read the full opinion (source) ↗


Lexace provides legal information, not legal advice, and no attorney–client relationship is created. Citation figures are counts of later citing opinions in our corpus and may be incomplete; always read and Shepardize the full opinion before relying on it.