Mischelle Richter v. Advance Auto Parts

U.S. Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit · Decided 2012-08-01

Cited by 163 later decision(s) in our corpus · see the citation network in Lexace

Open in Lexace · Ask the AI about this case

From the opinion

BYE, Circuit Judge, concurring in part and dissenting in part. In her judicial complaint, Richter alleged Advance Auto unlawfully retaliated *858 against her after she filed a discrimination charge with the EEOC. She further alleged the retaliation was a direct result of the filing of the EEOC charge. The issue…

Read the full opinion (source) ↗


Lexace provides legal information, not legal advice, and no attorney–client relationship is created. Citation figures are counts of later citing opinions in our corpus and may be incomplete; always read and Shepardize the full opinion before relying on it.