Miotke v. City of Spokane

Supreme Court of Washington · Decided 1984-03-15

Cited by 123 later decision(s) in our corpus · see the citation network in Lexace

Open in Lexace · Ask the AI about this case

From the opinion

Dore, J. (concurring in part, dissenting in part) — I con *344 cur in the result reached by the majority but would modify the attorney fees award. However, I would affirm judgment for damages under eminent domain as I find the majority's application of nuisance theory inappropriate. I dissent from award of attorney fees for services limited to the injunctive phase of…

Read the full opinion (source) ↗


Lexace provides legal information, not legal advice, and no attorney–client relationship is created. Citation figures are counts of later citing opinions in our corpus and may be incomplete; always read and Shepardize the full opinion before relying on it.