Minie v. Hudson

Decided 1997-03-11

Cited by 125 later decision(s) in our corpus · see the citation network in Lexace

Open in Lexace · Ask the AI about this case

From the opinion

KAUGER, Chief Justice: Two questions are presented on certiorari: 1) whether the verbal notice of claim communicated to the City was valid under the Tort Claims Act; and 2) whether, once the County began to clear Hudson’s drainage system, it had a duty to complete the job with due care. We find that: 1) the clear and mandatory language of 51 O.S.Supp.1992 § 156(D) <a class="…

Read the full opinion (source) ↗


Lexace provides legal information, not legal advice, and no attorney–client relationship is created. Citation figures are counts of later citing opinions in our corpus and may be incomplete; always read and Shepardize the full opinion before relying on it.