Mike Cohn, D.V.M. v. Petsmart, Inc., a Delaware Corporation

U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit · Decided 2002-02-12

Cited by 409 later decision(s) in our corpus · see the citation network in Lexace

Open in Lexace · Ask the AI about this case

From the opinion

OPINION PER CURIAM. Dr. Mike Cohn appeals the district court’s grant of summary judgment on his claim that Petsmart infringes his trademark “Where Pets are Family.” He presents two issues: 1) whether the amount in controversy required for diversity jurisdiction was satisfied, and 2) whether there is a likelihood of confusion in Petsmart’s use of Cohn’s m…

Read the full opinion (source) ↗


Lexace provides legal information, not legal advice, and no attorney–client relationship is created. Citation figures are counts of later citing opinions in our corpus and may be incomplete; always read and Shepardize the full opinion before relying on it.