Midland Steel Products Co. v. International Union, United Automobile, Aerospace & Agricultural Implement Workers, Local 486

Supreme Court of Ohio · Decided 1991-07-10

Cited by 157 later decision(s) in our corpus · see the citation network in Lexace

Open in Lexace · Ask the AI about this case

From the opinion

Wright, J., concurring. While concurring in the majority opinion, I write separately to address the avowed concerns of the dissent of my colleague. The judiciary cannot act as the cat’s paw for either management or labor where there is a breakdown in the collective bargaining process. I know from personal experience that the actions of the impartial arbiter — the peacemaker, if you will — rarely please eithe…

Read the full opinion (source) ↗


Lexace provides legal information, not legal advice, and no attorney–client relationship is created. Citation figures are counts of later citing opinions in our corpus and may be incomplete; always read and Shepardize the full opinion before relying on it.