Michael J. OLMSTED, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. TACO BELL CORPORATION, Defendant-Appellee

U.S. Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit · Decided 1998-05-28

Cited by 172 later decision(s) in our corpus · see the citation network in Lexace

Open in Lexace · Ask the AI about this case

From the opinion

BIRCH, Circuit Judge: In this employment discrimination action, a jury found that defendant-appellee Taco Bell Corporation (“Taco Bell”) retaliated against plaintiff-appellant Michael J. Olmsted in response to Olmsted’s complaints of discriminatory practices within Taco Bell and awarded both compensatory and punitive damages. The district court found that the jury verdict was…

Read the full opinion (source) ↗


Lexace provides legal information, not legal advice, and no attorney–client relationship is created. Citation figures are counts of later citing opinions in our corpus and may be incomplete; always read and Shepardize the full opinion before relying on it.