Meighan v. U.S. Sprint Communications Co.

Decided 1996-04-29

Cited by 325 later decision(s) in our corpus · see the citation network in Lexace

Open in Lexace · Ask the AI about this case

From the opinion

OPINION WHITE, Justice. In this case we are called upon to examine the application of Rule 23, Tennessee Rules of Civil Procedure to actions involving injuries to real property and to determine the *635 available causes of action and appropriate measure of damages in such actions. I. Plaintiff Meighan is a prope…

Read the full opinion (source) ↗


Lexace provides legal information, not legal advice, and no attorney–client relationship is created. Citation figures are counts of later citing opinions in our corpus and may be incomplete; always read and Shepardize the full opinion before relying on it.