Mead Corp. v. Tilley

Supreme Court of the United States · Decided 1989-06-05

Cited by 156 later decision(s) in our corpus · see the citation network in Lexace

Open in Lexace · Ask the AI about this case

From the opinion

Justice Marshall delivered the opinion of the Court. Today we decide whether, upon termination of a defined benefit plan, § 4044(a) of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (ERISA), 88 Stat. 1025 , as amended, 29 U. S. C. § 1344 (a) (1982 ed. and Supp. V), requires a plan administrator to pay plan participants unreduced ear…

Read the full opinion (source) ↗


Lexace provides legal information, not legal advice, and no attorney–client relationship is created. Citation figures are counts of later citing opinions in our corpus and may be incomplete; always read and Shepardize the full opinion before relying on it.