McCloskey Ex Rel. McCloskey v. Koplar

Decided 1932-02-06

Cited by 212 later decision(s) in our corpus · see the citation network in Lexace

Open in Lexace · Ask the AI about this case

From the opinion

GANTT, J. (dissenting).- — -The principal opinions are unwilling to admit that there is an exception to the rule that “the burden of proof abides with the plaintiff throughout the entire trial.” They resort to fiction. In the trial of an ordinary law suit there is no place for the application of this rule, unless the evidence “is equally balanced.” In effect it is so stated in the pri…

Read the full opinion (source) ↗


Lexace provides legal information, not legal advice, and no attorney–client relationship is created. Citation figures are counts of later citing opinions in our corpus and may be incomplete; always read and Shepardize the full opinion before relying on it.