Mazza v. Cavicchia

Supreme Court of New Jersey · Decided 1954-05-24

Cited by 100 later decision(s) in our corpus · see the citation network in Lexace

Open in Lexace · Ask the AI about this case

From the opinion

Heher, J. (concurring). Rule 31 of the department, considered in Part II, paragraph 3 of the opinion of the *527 Chief Justice, is all embraeive in its terms and scope, no matter what the nature of the conduct made the subject of disciplinary action; and I would reserve for fuller argument the question of whether the regulation, so read, has statutory sanction and in al…

Read the full opinion (source) ↗


Lexace provides legal information, not legal advice, and no attorney–client relationship is created. Citation figures are counts of later citing opinions in our corpus and may be incomplete; always read and Shepardize the full opinion before relying on it.