May v. Carlton

Decided 2008-01-18

Cited by 113 later decision(s) in our corpus · see the citation network in Lexace

Open in Lexace · Ask the AI about this case

From the opinion

WILLIAM C. KOCH, JR., J., with whom CORNELIA A. CLARK, J., joins, dissenting. I agree with the Court’s conclusion that the portion of the 1981 judgment declaring Randy L. May infamous is contrary to Tenn.Code Ann. § 40-2712 (1975) (amended 1981). 1 However, I cannot concur with the Court’s dramatic expansion of the application of the “great and efficacious” 2</footnotem…

Read the full opinion (source) ↗


Lexace provides legal information, not legal advice, and no attorney–client relationship is created. Citation figures are counts of later citing opinions in our corpus and may be incomplete; always read and Shepardize the full opinion before relying on it.