Mauzy v. Kelly Services, Inc.

Supreme Court of Ohio · Decided 1996-06-12

Cited by 426 later decision(s) in our corpus · see the citation network in Lexace

Open in Lexace · Ask the AI about this case

From the opinion

Cook, J., dissenting. I respectfully dissent. My disagreement is particularly with the stated proposition that “direct” evidence is a method of proof rather than a type of evidence, and with the conclusion that it is a factual question whether Mauzy’s lateral transfer can amount to a constructive discharge. DIRECT EVIDENCE The law is settled that direct evidence of discrimination obviates t…

Read the full opinion (source) ↗


Lexace provides legal information, not legal advice, and no attorney–client relationship is created. Citation figures are counts of later citing opinions in our corpus and may be incomplete; always read and Shepardize the full opinion before relying on it.