Matter of Noonan

Supreme Court of New Jersey · Decided 1986-04-03

Cited by 102 later decision(s) in our corpus · see the citation network in Lexace

Open in Lexace · Ask the AI about this case

From the opinion

PER CURIAM. We concur with the recommendation of the Disciplinary Review Board (DRB) in this matter that the respondent John W. Noonan’s temporary suspension from the practice of law for a period of more than four years is sufficient discipline. We add the following in order to clarify the treatment of the misappropriation issue involved in this case. In…

Read the full opinion (source) ↗


Lexace provides legal information, not legal advice, and no attorney–client relationship is created. Citation figures are counts of later citing opinions in our corpus and may be incomplete; always read and Shepardize the full opinion before relying on it.