Mattco Forge, Inc. v. Arthur Young & Co.

Decided 1997-02-07

Cited by 155 later decision(s) in our corpus · see the citation network in Lexace

Open in Lexace · Ask the AI about this case

From the opinion

CROSKEY, J., Concurring and Dissenting. With but one exception, I concur with the thoughtful and well-reasoned opinion of my colleagues. However, that exception is important as it relates to the very significant question of what jurors should be told about the “clear and convincing” evidentiary standard they are required to apply in determining a defendant’s < ="1"…

Read the full opinion (source) ↗


Lexace provides legal information, not legal advice, and no attorney–client relationship is created. Citation figures are counts of later citing opinions in our corpus and may be incomplete; always read and Shepardize the full opinion before relying on it.