Mathes v. Schwing

Decided 1929-04-29

Cited by 620 later decision(s) in our corpus · see the citation network in Lexace

Open in Lexace · Ask the AI about this case

From the opinion

ON REHEARING. JANVÍER, J. The facts of this case are fully stated in the original opinion and it is unnecessary to repeat them here. The rehearing was granted because we desired a fuller discussion of the question of the protection afforded by the traffic ordinance (to-wit, No. 7490 Commission Council Series) to a person not on the usual crossing, but emerging from behind a street car, and at…

Read the full opinion (source) ↗


Lexace provides legal information, not legal advice, and no attorney–client relationship is created. Citation figures are counts of later citing opinions in our corpus and may be incomplete; always read and Shepardize the full opinion before relying on it.