PER CURIAM: Appellant Gibson seeks reversal of the district court’s decision affirming a decision of the Administrative Law Judge (“AU”) that Gibson was not disabled under the Social Security Act and, thus, not entitled to disability benefits. Because the AU improperly and mechanically applied regulatory guidelines in determining that Gibson was not disabled, we vacate the dec…
Read the full opinion (source) ↗
Lexace provides legal information, not legal advice, and no attorney–client relationship is created. Citation figures are counts of later citing opinions in our corpus and may be incomplete; always read and Shepardize the full opinion before relying on it.