Masitto v. Masitto

Supreme Court of Ohio · Decided 1986-02-05

Cited by 173 later decision(s) in our corpus · see the citation network in Lexace

Open in Lexace · Ask the AI about this case

From the opinion

Per Curiam. The sole issue before this court is whether it is contrary to law for a trial court to proceed under the “best interest of the child” test enunciated in R.C. 3109.04 when the parent requesting a change in custody has previously consented to the appointment of the child’s grandparents as her guardians. The appellate court determined that the “suitability” test enunciated in In re Perales (1977…

Read the full opinion (source) ↗


Lexace provides legal information, not legal advice, and no attorney–client relationship is created. Citation figures are counts of later citing opinions in our corpus and may be incomplete; always read and Shepardize the full opinion before relying on it.