Marx v. State

Texas Court of Criminal Appeals · Decided 1999-02-03

Cited by 119 later decision(s) in our corpus · see the citation network in Lexace

Open in Lexace · Ask the AI about this case

From the opinion

KELLER, J., delivered a dissenting opinion. Appellant sought review of the Court of Appeals holdings affirming the trial court’s televising, via closed-circuit equipment, of the testimonies of two girls — B.J., the thirteen-year-old child victim, and J.M., a six-year-old child witness. Appellant alleged that this procedure violated Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, Article 38.071, the Confrontation Clause of th…

Read the full opinion (source) ↗


Lexace provides legal information, not legal advice, and no attorney–client relationship is created. Citation figures are counts of later citing opinions in our corpus and may be incomplete; always read and Shepardize the full opinion before relying on it.