Marvin v. Trout

Supreme Court of the United States · Decided 1905-11-13

Cited by 109 later decision(s) in our corpus · see the citation network in Lexace

Open in Lexace · Ask the AI about this case

From the opinion

Me. Justice Peckham, after making the foregoing statement, delivered the opinion of the court. The plaintiff in error seeks to reverse the judgments herein, based on the gamings statute of Ohio, because, as he insists, that statute is unconstitutional on several different grounds: First, , because it is (as he avers) an unconstitutional extension of the police…

Read the full opinion (source) ↗


Lexace provides legal information, not legal advice, and no attorney–client relationship is created. Citation figures are counts of later citing opinions in our corpus and may be incomplete; always read and Shepardize the full opinion before relying on it.