Martin v. People

Decided 2001-06-25

Cited by 324 later decision(s) in our corpus · see the citation network in Lexace

Open in Lexace · Ask the AI about this case

From the opinion

Justice COATS, dissenting: The majority holds that in 1998, when the General Assembly changed the sentencing scheme to mandate that felony sentences include a period of parole supervision extending as much as five years beyond the term of incarceration imposed by the court, it intended to exempt sex offenders, despite expressly naming them and singling them out for the longest possible period of "mandatory parole…

Read the full opinion (source) ↗


Lexace provides legal information, not legal advice, and no attorney–client relationship is created. Citation figures are counts of later citing opinions in our corpus and may be incomplete; always read and Shepardize the full opinion before relying on it.