Martin v. Martin

Supreme Court of Ohio · Decided 1985-07-24

Cited by 295 later decision(s) in our corpus · see the citation network in Lexace

Open in Lexace · Ask the AI about this case

From the opinion

Per Curiam. The appellee-wife argues that where a property division is not equitable, an appellate court is duty-bound under App. R. 12 to modify the inequitable division. The appellant-husband contends that the appellate court’s modification was based solely upon the existence of a disproportionate division of property, and that such court is without jurisdiction to modify such a division, absent a showing that the t…

Read the full opinion (source) ↗


Lexace provides legal information, not legal advice, and no attorney–client relationship is created. Citation figures are counts of later citing opinions in our corpus and may be incomplete; always read and Shepardize the full opinion before relying on it.