Martin v. Julius Dierck Equipment Co.

New York Court of Appeals · Decided 1978-01-18

Cited by 178 later decision(s) in our corpus · see the citation network in Lexace

Open in Lexace · Ask the AI about this case

From the opinion

OPINION OF THE COURT Jasen, J. The novel question posed by this appeal is whether, for purposes of CPLR 202, plaintiffs causes of action for personal injury accrued in the jurisdiction in which he was injured or *587 in the jurisdiction in which the vehicle alleged to have caused the injury was delivered. Plaintiff, a resident of the…

Read the full opinion (source) ↗


Lexace provides legal information, not legal advice, and no attorney–client relationship is created. Citation figures are counts of later citing opinions in our corpus and may be incomplete; always read and Shepardize the full opinion before relying on it.