Martin v. Hadenfeldt

Supreme Court of Washington · Decided 1930-07-07

Cited by 116 later decision(s) in our corpus · see the citation network in Lexace

Open in Lexace · Ask the AI about this case

From the opinion

Holcomb, J. (dissenting) — I dissent. The condemned instruction was correct under our decisions and the statutes applying thereto. As is said in the majority opinion, the last paragraph of the instruction leans somewhat toward curing the vice of what precedes it, and we have with some consistency, always held that instructions must be considered as en-tireties. In my opinion,…

Read the full opinion (source) ↗


Lexace provides legal information, not legal advice, and no attorney–client relationship is created. Citation figures are counts of later citing opinions in our corpus and may be incomplete; always read and Shepardize the full opinion before relying on it.