Marshall v. Vise

Supreme Court of Texas · Decided 1989-03-29

Cited by 166 later decision(s) in our corpus · see the citation network in Lexace

Open in Lexace · Ask the AI about this case

From the opinion

DOGGETT, Justice. This appeal presents the issue of whether a party’s failure to object at trial to testimony contrary to an opponent’s deemed admissions waives the effect of those admissions. Ted Vise sued J. Howard Marshall, II for tortious interference with a business contract. The trial court rendered a take-nothing judgment. The court of appeals, relying on Marshall’s deeme…

Read the full opinion (source) ↗


Lexace provides legal information, not legal advice, and no attorney–client relationship is created. Citation figures are counts of later citing opinions in our corpus and may be incomplete; always read and Shepardize the full opinion before relying on it.