Marshall v. District of Columbia

Decided 1978-09-18

Cited by 110 later decision(s) in our corpus · see the citation network in Lexace

Open in Lexace · Ask the AI about this case

From the opinion

FERREN, Associate Judge: This is a false arrest and battery case. Plaintiff-appellant Melvin A. Marshall maintains, first, that the trial court’s entry of judgment for defendant-appellee District of Columbia (District) at the close of plaintiff’s case was erroneous because it was not supported by the evidence. He also contends that the trial court’s grant of defendant’s request…

Read the full opinion (source) ↗


Lexace provides legal information, not legal advice, and no attorney–client relationship is created. Citation figures are counts of later citing opinions in our corpus and may be incomplete; always read and Shepardize the full opinion before relying on it.